Formula 1 officials rejected two protests by Mercedes against the result of the controversial title-deciding Abu Dhabi Grand Prix, with the team ready to appeal against i of those decisions.
Max Verstappen passed Lewis Hamilton's Mercedes for the victory that won him the championship later a tardily safety car.
Mercedes argued race director Michael Masi did not apply the rules correctly.
The team accept lodged an intention to appeal against the decision relating to restarting the race for the concluding lap.
Officials said other rules gave Masi the power to act equally he did.
Mercedes' second appeal was over Blood-red Balderdash'due south Verstappen nosing ahead of Hamilton a number of times on the lap earlier the restart. They are not intending to entreatment against that thing.
- Total race results
- Verstappen wins title as Mercedes protests dismissed
- 'A Verstappen can't lose' - the making of an F1 phenomenon
- Verstappen relishes 'unbelievable' title win and wants Red Bull to dominate
- How a dramatic F1 finale unfolded on social media
What was the row about?
The main controversy arose over the manner Masi handled the conclusion to restart the race at the start of the final lap.
Whoever won the race would win the championship and Hamilton had dominated throughout after passing Verstappen at the start and being allowed to proceed the atomic number 82 despite cutting the chicane when Verstappen tried to laissez passer him back, on the grounds Hamilton had been forced off the track.
When Williams driver Nicholas Latifi crashed with five laps to go, the safe car was deployed and Verstappen pitted for new tyres. Hamilton could not considering he would have lost the lead.
It put Verstappen right backside Hamilton on much fresher, grippier tyres, and the Dutchman passed Hamilton on the last lap.
- Winning Formula? Hamilton, Verstappen & Netflix drive F1 resurgence
Why was it controversial?
At restarts after condom-car periods, lapped cars are commonly allowed to pass the leaders and un-lap themselves so they practice not interfere with the race.
Masi immune the drivers between Hamilton and Verstappen to pass them, giving Verstappen a articulate run at his rival. But did non do the same to the cars betwixt Verstappen and 3rd-placed Carlos Sainz'southward Ferrari.
Article 48.12 of the sporting regulations says: "If the clerk of the course considers information technology rubber to do then, and the message 'lapped cars may now overtake' has been sent to all competitors via the official messaging system, whatsoever cars that have been lapped by the leader volition be required to laissez passer the cars on the lead lap and the safety automobile."
At the same time, article 48.12 of the sporting regulations says that "once the final lapped machine has passed the leader, the safety car will render to the pits at the stop of the post-obit lap". In this example, the race was started at the end of the same lap.
Had both rules been applied in this way, Mercedes argued, Hamilton would accept won the race.
The stewards ruled that a split rule gave Masi the power to command the rubber car, which "includes its deployment and withdrawal".
They added: "Although article 48.12 may not have been applied fully, in relation to the safety car returning to the pits at the end of the following lap, article 48.13 overrides that and in one case the bulletin 'prophylactic car in this lap' has been displayed, it is mandatory to withdraw the condom auto at the end of that lap.
They added that Mercedes' request to remedy the matter by amending the event by taking the positions at the end of the penultimate lap "is a step that the stewards believe is effectively shortening the race retrospectively, and hence non appropriate".
What about overtaking under circumspection?
On the thing of Verstappen passing Hamilton before the race had re-started, the stewards said: "Although [Verstappen] did at ane stage, for a very short period of fourth dimension, move slightly in front of [Hamilton], at a time when both cars where accelerating and braking, it moved dorsum behind and it was not in front end when the Prophylactic Car period ended [ie, at the line]."
Red Bull team principal Christian Horner said: "Nosotros never wanted to end up in front end of the stewards. We don't go racing with barristers. It was a shame information technology ended up there only the stewards made the right call.
"Nosotros take talked about 'let them race'. [The late Mercedes non-executive chairman] Niki Lauda was the guy who pushed hard for it and we've always talked about not finishing races nether safety cars. The race director in difficult circumstances fabricated absolutely the right call."
He said Mercedes' protest "felt a little bit drastic".
- 'He lived for his music': The boggling story of Freddie Mercury and his battle with Aids
- From John O'Groats to Land's End: Meet the man who's driving 870 miles in the earth's smallest car
DOWNLOAD HERE
How to Draw a Formula 1 Race Car TUTORIAL
Posted by: franksonsiziefall.blogspot.com
Comments
Post a Comment